12 Sep, 2008 in Taiwan by Fili An Tags: calcalist; chen shui bian; politics; Taiwan;

The Chen Shui Bian scandal is always on the news. What a mess. Another article I wrote for Israeli Calcalist, this time about the Chen Shui Bian scandal in Taiwan.

Here’s the Hebrew article, followed by a very quick English translation :

שערוריה תוצרת טייוואן

הנשיא לשעבר צ’ן שווי ביאן הודה כי כ-25 מיליון דולר מכספי קמפיין בחירות הועברו לחשבון השוויצרי של כלתו. להגנתו טען: אין חוק מקומי שדורש דיווח על קבלת תרומות פוליטיות.

A “Made in Taiwan” Scandal : An article for Calcalistבאחד מהסקנדלים החמורים ביותר בתולדות הדמוקרטיה הטייוואנית הודה צ’ן שווי ביאן, נשיאה הקודם של טייוואן, בקיומם של כשבע מאות מיליון דולרים טייוואנים של כספי קמפיין בחירות (כ25 מיליון דולרים אמריקאים) בחשבון השווצרי של כלתו הואנג ג’וי-צ’ינג. הודעתו באה לאחר שהשלטונות השווצרים שחקרו את חשבון הבנק בחשדות להלבנת כספים פנו אל טייוואן על מנת לעמוד על טיב מקור הכספים בחשבון המנופח. צ’ן הוחלף כנשיא במאי על ידי נשיא טייוואן הנוכחי ונציג מפלגת הגאומינגנד הכחולה – מה יינג ג’יו – לאחר שזה הביס את נציג המפלגה הדמוקרטית הפרוגרסיבית הירוקה. הסיבות להפסד הירוקים היו קשורות גם בדעת קהל שלילית ביותר בנוגע לתפקודו של הנשיא צ’ן והחשדות החוזרות ונשנות לשחיתות של משפחתו ומקורביו למרות כי עד כה לא נמצאה תמיכה ממשית לאישוש חשדות אלה.

צ’ן התנצל והודה כי פעל שלא ביושר בדיווח כספים אלו וציין שמקורם ביתרות של תרומות תומכים וסובדיות ממשלתיות שנאספו בקמפיינים ההתמודדויות השונות של צ’ן כמועמד המפלגה הדמוקרטית הפרוגרסיבית לתפקיד ראש עיר טייפיי ופעמיים לנשיאות טייוואן. צ’ן טוען כי ניהול הכספים בוצע באופן בלעדי על ידי אישתו והיא שביצעה את העברת הכספים בחו”ל. באשר לדיווח קבלת הסכומים הגדולים טוען צ’ן כי אין בטייוואן חוק אשר דורש דיווח קבלת תרומות פוליטיות וכי החוק דורש  רק דיווח על השימוש בתרומות אלו. הכספים, לדבריו, הועברו לחו”ל על מנת שיעמדו לרשותו לקמפיינים פוליטים עתידיים של מפלגתו בעת הצורך לאחר סיום הקדנציה כשם שעשו בכירים פוליטים אחרים בעבר, כגון נשיאה הדמוקרטי הראשון של טייוואן לי טנג הווי, אשר הכחיש מצידו את ההאשמות הללו. מקרה זה פותח קופת שרצים פוליטית אשר עשויה להוביל לחקירה של התנהלותם הפיננסית של בכירים פוליטיים נוספים בטייואן מכלל מגוון הקשת הפוליטית.

התפתחויות אלו מהווות מכה פוליטית אנושה לירוקים בטייוואן ותומכי תנועת העצמאות הטייוואנית אשר חוששים כי שערוריה זו תבטל את השגיה הפוליטיים של המפלגה הדמוקרטית הפרוגרסיבית ליצירת זהות טיוואנית נפרדת מסין וקידום ההכרה המקומית והעולמית בטייוואן כיישות ריבונית. בלוגרים ואנשי רוח ירוקים זועמים על צ’ן והפרשיה, שהשפעתה השלילית הקיצונית על דעת הקהל הטייוואנית מסיתה – לדבריהם – את מוקד הביקורת מהנשיא מה ומדיניותו הפוליטית השנויה במחלוקת מול סין למפלגתם. הנשיא מה הגיב בדיפלומטיות כי הרשויות הטייוואנית ידרשו לבחינה מדוקדת של נסיבות העברת הכספים ומקורם. משרד התובע הממשלתי פתח בחקירה רשמית נרחבת אשר כוללת מספר רב של מקורבים ואת חברי משפחת צ’ן, כולל ילדיו של צ’ן שנקראו לטייוואן מחו”ל על מנת לעמוד בפני שאלות החוקרים. צ’ן, בינתיים, הודיע על התפטרותו מהמפלגה ופרישה מהחיים הפוליטיים.

And the quick English translation:

A “Made in Taiwan” Scandal

Former president Chen Shui Bian admitted that 25 million US$ of campaign money have been transferred to his daughter-in-law’ Swiss bank account. To his defense he claims : there is no local law requiring declaration of receiving political donations.

In one of the worst scandals in the history of democratic Taiwan, Chen Shui Bian – former president of Taiwan, confirmed the existence of 700 million NT$ of campaign money (around 25 million US$) in his daughter in law’s Swiss bank account. This press release followed the Swiss inquiry into the bank account in suspicion of money laundering. This last May, Chen Shui Bian was replaced by Mr. Ma Ying Jiu as Taiwan’s president – the blue candidate KMT presidential candidate, after defeating the green DPP candidate. Among the reasons attributed to the loss is the very negative public opinion regarding president Chen’s performance and the repeating suspicions of corruption against his family and associates.

Chen apologized and admitted that he failed to report this money. He stated that the source for the money is left overs of donations and government subsidies collected in Chen’s campaigns as the DPP candidate for mayor of Taipei and president of Taiwan. Chen further claimed that his wife was the one in charge of the funds and that it was she who transferred the money to the Swiss bank account. As for receiving such large sums, Chen argues that Taiwan doesn’t have a law requiring candidates to report political donations, and that the law only requires reporting how they are being used. Chen says that the money was transferred abroad so it can server him in future political campaigns after leaving office, as many politicians have done before him, pointing to former president Lee Dong Hui who refused the accusations. This case opens a political Pandora’s box that might lead to a financial probe of other Taiwanese leading politicians of all parties.

Those developments have had deadly implications on Taiwan’s Green supporters. Those fear that his scandal will eliminate the political achievements of the DPP of forming a Taiwanese national identity and promoting the local and global acknowledgement of Taiwan’s sovereignty.  Green media is outraged with Chen. According to them, this story diverts the center of attention from Ma Ying Jiu and his controversial political agenda with China to the DPP. Ma has issued a diplomatic statement saying that the Taiwanese authorities will have to look further into the case. The government prosecutor has launched an official probe into Chen, his associates and family, including his kids – who were called back to Taiwan from abroad. Chen, in the meanwhile, resigned from the DPP.

Such a tragedy. Don’t know how this will turn out but it’s really a shame – although controversial, Chen could have been remembered for something completely different.

Like a few Israelis replied to this story, referring to the ongoing Israeli prime minister investigation – seems like Taiwan and Israel aren’t that different after all, politicians are politicians anywhere.

Previous posted articles :

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: A “Made in Taiwan” Scandal : An article for Calcalist

  • cat - Taiwan is already a victim.
  • cat
    You mentioned Kosovo, a bad example. Soon following it now comes South Ossetia, together with a war. Unfortunately, as you see, such a so-called democracy has been reduced to a tool of world powers for their contention of domination. Would Taiwan be the next victim?
  • cat - I don't assume -all- people want independence. I don't even assume a single Taiwanese wants independence. I can't even say whether independence is what's right for Taiwan and if it is in what form or shape. I'm not Taiwanese. Again, I say it's for the Taiwanese people to decide this. Democracy is not a perfect tool, but it's the best one we have to determine this sort of thing. Democracy works in a way in which the majority decides and the rest follow, as long as it is done with the right checks and balances in a lawful manner. Which means that Taiwan should do this as the entity it is, Taipei and the rest altogether. As long as this is not brought to a vote (which by its own will unleash the rage of the PRC) we won't know how the Taiwanese choose to address this.
  • cat
    The "people" itself is not a single unit. You assume all the people in Taiwan do not accept the current constitution and want to have a Taiwan nation. That is not the fact. All the time those who wholeheartedly pursue the Taiwan independence occupy only a relatively small fraction of the population. At the same time still numerous people endorse the Republic of China. Supposing a Taiwan nation established itself there, how should those who do not support it do? Considering most of them residing in the north, will they be allowed, with a democratic procedure, to claim the nothern Taiwan or Taipei independent from the "Taiwan nation", or, just as our scandal hero Mr. Chen ever suggested: "The Pacific is not covered. They might as well swim to the other side of the Strait"?
  • 1 - there is no negation. I don't know whether it is accepted by them or not, because it was never accepted by them. There was no democratic procedure for them to vote on their future. It was decided for them.
    2 - there is a difference between recognizing some entity as "China" by name, which means little, and recognizing an entity as being sovereign. What I was saying is that the UN tends to ignore millions of people as not existing. When it was the "ROC" as "China", hundreds of millions of Mainland Chinese had no recognition nor representation in the UN, did that mean that they didn't exist? that the "international community" need not or does not recognize them? it didn't, it was a cold political decision in a cold war era led by western powers. Who decides when ethnicity turns into nationality? who decides Kosovo is a nation, not an ethnicity? I say the people do. In this case, America is far from being Taiwan's friend. Other, much smaller friends, do - to an extent that they can with the impossible external forces that they face. Again, this is on an official level, in an unofficial level, all countries maintain almost full diplomatic-economic-cultural relations with Taiwan under various names, not always as ROC. You want to keep repeating "Taiwan" is not being recognized? suan le, whatever makes you feel more comfortable. Again, we choose to see different things.
  • cat
    "I don’t know whether they accept it or not"--you've negated yourself with these words; if you don't know what exactly these people want, you'd better not act as their spokesman. Of course you may find a thousand plausible reasons but the reality is just there is not a Taiwan nation yet and without a nation how can we speak of nationality? Let's say, for instance, before the state of Israel was established in 1948 there were only the Jewish people in ethnicity but no Israeli in nationality. This is a simple logic. Think about it.

    For the second, you are substituting the concept stealthily. The UN recognizes China from the beginning: firstly ROC and then after 1971 the PRC. And I reclaim with confidence that no one of the international community recognizes a Taiwan nation--even our American friend does not.
  • 1. I don't know whether they accept it or not, but the way it was first drafted and applied to Taiwan was not democratic, it wasn't even meant originally for Taiwan. Poll or survey? lots of those out there but they don't count much for anything. As long as you have a 500kg gorilla outside your door waiting to erupt if you only start thinking of a banana, you're gonna be extremely care with what you say.
    2. You atleast changed from "no one" to "the international community". Well, that same international community didn't recognize China till 1971 either, and then things changed. If it wasn't for the American veto, Israel would be long abolished by the Arab lobby pressure in the UN. "The international community" which you so generously attribute to the UN, is a fluid definition.
  • cat
    1. How do you know the people there do not accept the constitution? Just give me a poll or survey result on it (not anything else).

    2. Unfortunately the suggestion was rejected by the UN, as usual. Evidently the international community does not recognize a Taiwan nation.
  • 1. This constitution was forced upon the Taiwanese people, not accepted by them. They can't change it because of a constant external threat.
    2. I only argue facts, not judgment. It was the 20 UN members that just two days ago suggested that Taiwan be accepted to the UN special agencies. Not to be readmitted, not to replace China. It was even more direct during the Chen administration. I'm making it as clear as I can.

    I have to repeat my statement that I would only like to set forth facts and reasons here. You can make your own judgment on them. I myself am not pro or against anybody.
    As for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - its the same thing. Different sides argue different facts. There are no 'facts', everything is subjective in politics.
  • cat
    1. Republic of China wasn’t removed because this is a violation of the Constitution. Well I almost forget you even would not admit this constitution... I have no words.

    2. It seems you mistake or neglect some facts again. Indeed over 20 UN members recognize a state called ROC, but not one called Taiwan (since there is not such a nation at all). Please make it clear.

    I have to repeat my statement that I would only like to set forth facts and reasons here. You can make your own judgement on them. I myself am not pro or against anybody. This is the same to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I know all the facts of it but I am not going to make any judgement and thus you should not label right or left wing on me.
  • 1. Republic of China wasn't removed because of the Chinese threat of violence, or as you put it "just what the PRC dreams of". In any case, things like that can change, if decided so by the people.

    2. Your common sense and other's is different. As for the recognition of Taiwanese sovereignty - it is still somehow acknowledged by over 20 UN members publicly and all nations maintain economic and cultural interactions with Taiwan through TECO offices. Nothing that has to do with China. But you already know all this better than I do...

    I'm curious about is how you view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many of your claims could very well fit the somewhat militant right wing in Israel.
  • cat
    1. What I have said is there is not a Taiwan nation in the world. You see Taiwan on the passport but how do you explain China there out? Why did not Chen remove "Republic of China" at the same time he added Taiwan on the passport?
    (Well, I've got a postulation for this question. Chen SB is in fact a mole sent by the CCP into DPP; what he did in his presidency is just to cause conflicts inside Taiwan, to debilitate its economy as possible as he can, to make troubles internationally and bring Taiwan to the hazard of war, as well as to put Taiwan together with China on the passport to imply to the world that Taiwan is part of China. Surely he would also remove ROC from there if possible, and this is just what the PRC dreams of. lol)
    2. The de-facto situation is just there is not a state or nation with the name Taiwan. This fact is officially acknowledged by all the countries throughout the world, including Israel. Of course anyone may personally claim a Taiwan state or nation, but sorry, it is invalid officially and legally and it's not a common sense.
  • cat - you were saying there is no Taiwan and that I should look at the passport. I did, and it has "Taiwan" in it. The fact that it includes "Republic of China" as well means little. North Korea includes the word "Democratic" on the passport but the country has nothing to do with democracy. This is only to say that your argument about national titles means very little.

    We can go back and forth all year. Either way we can agree that we disagree.

    You would like to suggest that Taiwan is part of a greater entity that includes the word China within its title, I would like to suggest that it's a controversy that's up to the Taiwanese people living in Taiwan to decide, but when considering the de-facto situation many would disagree with your suggestion.
  • cat
    You have selectively neglected the "Republic of China" above, haven't you?
    This is just like a kid's trick on words. Unfortunately it seems more likely to show nothing but Taiwan is part of ROC (this is true).
    Let us take a look at a Hong Kong passport, on which Hong Kong is also put, not only in English but also in Chinese.
    http://image.baidu.com/i?ct=503316480&z=0&a...
  • Cat - I don't agree with this definition. Yet, just so you know, if there's one thing Chen Shui Bian did regarding national identity is put Taiwan on every possible Taiwan diplomatic paper and the passport is no exception, Taiwan has been printed on passports and it shows up on my VISA - example : http://www.worldpress.org/images/111103pp.jpg .
  • cat
    I wonder of your definition of a "nation". For me, it is simple; if I want to know which national a certain person is I will just take a look at his passport.
  • cat - it depends who you talk to. Either way, it doesn't make anybody in Taiwan a Japanese or Chinese national.
  • cat
    That is the point. Do we have a nation called "Taiwan" on the earth? No, we've got only the Republic of China.
  • cat - Not to step on anybody's toes, but since when does ethnicity have anything to do with nationality? one can be a Chinese Jew, as one can be an Israeli Chinese, and ofcourse there are many Jews who are not Israelis, and many Israeli who are not Jews. Ethnicity doesn't determine nationality.
  • cat
    sorry, you are wrong. Surely Olmert is a Jew and Bush is a WASP. Ethnically neither of them are Chinese.
  • cat - China has them all. Olmert is also a Harbin Chinese, and I think I saw Bush lip syncing when the Chinese national anthem was playing during the Olympics opening ceremony.
  • cat
    Well, China already has a Chen Shui-Bien. I think that is enough for them.
  • cat - Alleged corruption doesn't erase a man's accomplishment and the spirit behind some of his actions, and I believe this is what the Green applaud in Chen's case. If Rabin, with his wife's off-shore dollar accounts, Barak and Netanyahu with their campaign/party money and Olmert+Sharon with their endless dubious business affairs still make it to the Israeli hall-of-fame and can survive politically, maybe even make a remarkable political comeback, then Taiwan's Chen Shui Bian is maybe more understandable.
    Other Asian countries have their own special representatives, with Taksin's nephew(, was it?, ) that just got the vote to represent his party. And China, naturally, has its own share of "interesting" leaders. It is not to suggest that the men shouldn't be held accountable to the wrong they've done, but that they are about more than just that, they hold and promote a message that some people believe in. We'll see how this Taiwanese story plays out.

    Just my 2 agorot.
  • cat
    Ironically, even after having admitted the scandal Chen still received a warm welcome from his fellow Green supporters who donated the campaign money that has been transferred to Chen's daughter-in-law's Swiss bank account. It seems that the Green crowd never mind having a corrupt politician to lead them. To the word "tragedy" I prefer using a "satire" to describe it.
blog comments powered by Disqus