In almost all of my class discussions there is a general assumption that Democracy is what’s good for China. Especially when it comes to discussing urban China and the modern changes in society the question of whether this is good for bringing democracy to China always comes up, usually accompanied with the hope that China will soon realize its mistake and abandon Communism in favor of the western Democracy. They might be right, they might be wrong, but somehow – this bothers me each time, and after one of the classes I even took the time to share my thoughts with the lecturer on e-mail:
It is quite understandable that Israelis, and the west in general, have very clear ideas about what’s right for China, like "Democracy is the right thing for China". But, imagine the response if the Chinese would say they would like to see Israel or the US become communist. Moreover, the "west" believes that it has all the right solutions for the right political and economical model – based on free and open capitalist economy. Yet, I believe it’s important to state that East-Asian countries allow a more in-depth discussion regarding this policy, with fascinating east Asian examples like Singapore, Thailand (former Taiwan) and lately China/Vietnam.
If we take Singapore as an example, then it has a non-democratic rule (one party etc.) with a very tight control over the direction of the economy and it is a very successful country/city with one of the highest standards of living in the world. [...]
Somehow, I still wasn’t able to have an in-depth open discussion about this with anyone here in Israel, and all I have are questions and thoughts about the western commitment to what I perceive is an attempt to change or influence Asia to fit western standards.
(BTW – the same question can be asked regarding Arab nations, with the recent "democratic" fiascos in the Palestinian Territories, Iraq and Lebanon)
Who’s to say whether "Democracy is better than Communism" or whether "Communism is better than Democracy" (GooogIe) :